Anna van Densky OPINION The German presidency of the Council of the European Union takes lead on 1 July 2020 in the context of the global COVID-19 crisis, and the EU ante-pandemic challanges, which have been already serious enough to be assessed as the “existential” threats to the organisation.
The first half of the year the global COVID-19 context has been negatively impacting long existing EU challenges, namely the well-known process of post-Brexit talks with the United Kingdom, aiming to produce an agreement to diminish damages to the European economies of “hard” Brexit; and not less significant EU agreement on the future seven year budget (multiannual financial framework) for the 27 members strong bloc without the UK – the second net contributor.
None of the ante-COVID19 challenges seem to be diminishing, on contrary, the Brexit talks are in libmo, so is the future budget, dividing the EU in groups of wealthy countries of the North, and indebted Mediterranean – pre-existing North-South divide is becoming even more dramatic after pandemic. The so-called “Frugal Four” – Austria, Denmark, Finland and The Netherlands – will hardly change their minds in favour of the South, reflecting the will of their citizens. Finanical Ice Age approaching, will the EU, especially the Visegrad East European countries, withstand it? They have been used to recipient role within the organisation, and they might object to any other.
However outside the EU the challenges are not less impressive: it is on the November 3 Americans will go to ballot boxes to elect their new President, producing a long-lasting effect on the entire set of international relations, and global development.
The EU dialogue with Russia, a former “strategic partner” and well-establish American foe is also on the brink, plagued in different dimensions internationally both by the conflict in Donbass, and U.S. sanctions blocking the construction of final 160 km of Nord Stream 2 pipeline, delivering gas via the sea from Russia to Germany.
The energy issues, and conflict are not limited to the EU Eastern borders, because the situation in the Mediterranean became even more alarming with the new Turkish assertiveness, pursuing gaz drilling in Cyprus waters, and casually threatening with massive release of migrants to Greece.
Migrants! And here we come to a sensitive issue, because still there is public opinion, blaming the German Chancellor her generous invitation to “all refugees”, which created the notorious migrant crisis in 2015 – swinging in a few months from Willkommenskultur to Flushtilingskrise. Since then there have been no acute migrant crisis of the similar scale, but an ongoing political systemic crisis over the issue, without unanimously agreed strategy towards exterior migration flows into EU, splitting the Union into antagonising communities. So far the Visegrad 4 group of East European countries firmly rejects the reception of migrants, occasionally ready to allocate funds.
In January this year, addressing Davos, Angela Merkel said, that it was a mistake to miss out of view the refugees as a direct consequence of conflict, and not to create an environment, where people can stay, without need to flee. Concluding German migrant experience, Angela Merkel, warned about possible next wave of refugees caused by military actions in Libya. But reflecting upon Chancellors’s words, there is no secret that solidarity does not really work in the realm of migration issues, and in post-pandemic period the migrant/refugee unsolved problem will re-emerge again. The only element about migration is consensual among member-states: Dublin system is obsolete. Will German presidency produce a new migration package in co-operation with the European Commission? The escalating conflict in Libya, and growing terrorist threat in Sahel, might create in the nearest future a significant pressure of migrant flows via Mediterranean route, resulting in raise of the eurosceptic moods in the Member-States.
The German presidency of EU will also ‘crown’ personally Angela Merkel’s fourth and final term of leadership after 15 years in the Federal Chancellery. Well-known for her capacity of reaching compromises, erecting solid political consturctions through multilateral agreements, she is expected to navigate between Scylla and Charybdis of the EU politics. Will Macron-Merkel initiative put forward on May 2020 – the stimulus fund – become a further step for European integration, solidifying the seamless transnational market enshrined by Kohl-Mitterand in Maastricht Treaty? Or the Eurosceptic forces will start pulling it apart, fragmenting and polarising communities, and the European nations, attempting to find the solutions to systemic crisises in individual ways?..
Whatever the outcome of German presidency will be, the decisions taken within next six months will shape the live of the next generation of Europeans and model the face of Europe up to the mid of the 21 century in a unique irreversible way.
Image: Angela Merkel, EU Council, archive
Future historians may view the EU as a failed experiment.
LikeLike
Sadly the EU has neglected its own rules, and started to invite everyone regardless Copenhagen criteria. 2004 Big Enlargement was the beginning of the downfall. However the recent promise to welcome Albania – the Columbia of Europe, will be the last nail in the coffin. Which I personally find not only startling, but beyond understanding. Why investing so much in Europol operations, and then rolling red carpet to drug barons?
LikeLike
Why try to force Hungary and Poland to take more refugees and “migrants” that are clearly not assimillable? The EU is an attempt to rule Europe from Brussels, and the best way for unsatisfied countries is to leave it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Brussels? I think that many things are ruled from Soros office Washington DC.. Otherwise how come that the EU degraded to a stage when an opinion of an American toursit is more valuable than the one of Prime Minister of Hungary?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Voktor ORban is a true statesman and is very popular in Hungary. The same holds for Matteo Salvini in Italy.
Soros is an evil man, but he is not alone. Billionaire Bill Gates does much harm through his Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunatley we have reached the stage when international corporations have more power than nation-state electorate. Democracy in decline.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Here in the US, corporations and their lobbyists in Washington do exert undue influence over the national government. We have corporatism, not true free market, entrepreneurial capitalism. The US is becoming fascistic.
The problem for Europeans is that with the fake history we have of the World War II period, nationalism is reflexively considered racist, fascist, “Nazism” and anti-Semitic. Yet, nationalistic leaders like Viktor Orban are needed to resist the diktats coming from the globalists in Brussels.
LikeLiked by 1 person